Wellness 69
Grown-up answers, plainly given

Stress & Mood

Grief, and what nobody tells you

The stages model was never meant to describe bereavement, and the reality is less orderly and more physical.

A lone person walks along a misty forest trail in Italy, creating a serene and contemplative mood.
A lone person walks along a misty forest trail in Italy, creating a serene and contemplative mood. · Photo via Pexels
Medical disclaimer. This site publishes health journalism, not medical advice. Read the full disclaimer.

Almost everything the public believes about grief comes from a model developed to describe dying patients rather than bereaved people, and never validated as a sequence.

The stages problem

The five stages were proposed from observations of terminally ill patients and were subsequently applied to bereavement, where they took hold in popular culture.

Research examining whether bereaved people move through them in order has not supported it.

The harm is specific: people conclude they are grieving incorrectly because they have not reached acceptance, or because they felt relief before sadness, or because anger never arrived.

Better-supported models describe oscillation between confronting the loss and attending to ongoing life, with people moving back and forth rather than progressing — which matches what bereaved people describe considerably better.

What it actually looks like

More varied and more physical than expected.

Waves rather than a decline, frequently triggered by something trivial months later.

Physical symptoms: exhaustion, chest tightness, appetite change, disturbed sleep, aching, a genuine sense of heaviness.

Cognitive effects: poor concentration, forgetfulness, difficulty with decisions, which people find frightening.

Searching behaviour — looking for the person in crowds, thinking you have heard them — which is common and not a sign of losing your grip.

Sensing the presence of the person who died, reported by a substantial proportion of bereaved people across cultures and not indicative of pathology.

Relief, which is extremely common after a long illness and produces enormous guilt.

Anger at the person who died.

And a numbness early on that people mistake for not caring, and which is a protective response.

The physical risk

Worth knowing.

Bereavement is associated with a measurable increase in mortality in the period immediately following a death, particularly in older spouses, with cardiovascular events elevated in the first weeks.

Stress cardiomyopathy — takotsubo — is genuinely triggered by acute emotional stress and presents like a heart attack.

Which means the physical symptoms of grief deserve attention rather than dismissal, and that existing conditions and medications need continued management at exactly the time people stop looking after themselves.

Prolonged grief

Now a recognised diagnosis, and it is a specific and narrow category.

It describes persistent, pervasive longing or preoccupation with the deceased, accompanied by intense emotional pain, lasting well beyond expected social and cultural norms — generally at least six months to a year — and causing significant impairment.

It affects a minority of bereaved people.

Its recognition was controversial precisely because of the risk of pathologising ordinary grief, and the safeguard is the duration and impairment threshold.

It has specific treatments with trial evidence, which is the reason for defining it at all.

Risk factors include sudden or violent death, the death of a child, a dependent relationship, and lack of support.

What helps

Less than people hope, and some things reliably.

Being able to talk about the person, by name, without other people changing the subject.

Practical help rather than offers of help, since the bereaved rarely ask.

Continuing contact past the first month, when everyone else stops.

Routine, sleep and eating, which sound trivial and hold the structure together.

Bereavement support groups, where hearing others describe the same experiences resolves the fear of grieving abnormally.

And time, which is the unsatisfying answer and the accurate one — with the caveat that grief does not disappear so much as become something the person carries differently.

What does not help

Timetables, from anyone.

Comparison to other losses.

Encouragement to move on, get closure, or find the positive.

Avoiding mentioning the person for fear of upsetting someone, which is the most common and most isolating mistake — bereaved people are already thinking about them constantly.

Routine prescription of medication for ordinary grief, which does not treat it and which guidance advises against.

And single-session psychological debriefing after traumatic events, which has been shown not to help and in some studies to be harmful.

What to say

Since this is the question people actually have.

Say that you are sorry, say the person's name, and say something specific you remember about them.

Offer something concrete rather than anything.

Ask how today is rather than how they are.

Do not fill silence.

And keep turning up, particularly after the funeral, when the practical activity stops and the actual grief begins.

General information only, not medical advice. Consult a qualified clinician if grief is severe or prolonged, and seek urgent help if you have thoughts of harming yourself.

griefbereavementlosssupport
Grace Oyelaran
Relationships & Intimacy, Wellness 69

Grace is a psychosexual therapist. She writes about desire and mismatch without euphemism and without sensationalism.

More from Grace →

Also by Grace Oyelaran

Stress & Mood

The mental health of men, specifically

Presentation differs, help-seeking is lower, and the suicide statistics are the clearest evidence that something is not working.

Tom Halvorsen··3 min read

Stress & Mood

What exercise does for the mind

The mental health evidence is stronger than the popular version and more specific about what and how much.

Tom Halvorsen··3 min read

Everyday Body

Eyes, screens and what actually damages them

Screens cause genuine symptoms and not the damage attributed to them, while the things that do cause harm get less attention.

Dr Ayesha Quraishi··3 min read